Looters, archaeologists, and hitmen.

Here we have another media outlet, the Daily Mail, that hasn't bothered to look up the difference between "archaeology" and "looting".  To be fair the Daily Mail hasn't sunk quite to the level of National Geographic--at least this article highlights the acquisitive, destructive, and outright weird side of looting rather than presenting it it as a fun-filled pasttime.  

Mail Online: Archaeologist, 72, who kept headless native American mummies in his back garden after looting graves and tried to pay for hit on rival with OPALS dies in prison

(Ok, yes.  It IS an awesome headline.)

National Geographic and Spike TV, you might want to take note--if the protagonists of Diggers! took out hits on each other and kept the headless bodies of children in their backyards, it might do wonders for your ratings.  Have your people call mine.

Jon Stewart on the history of anti-immigrant hysteria

19th-century nativism.
"The Usual Irish Way of Doing Things"
by Thomas Nast, Harper's Weekly, 2 September 1871.
Wikimedia Commons

Jon Stewart puts the US Right's nativist hysteria in historical context.  It's all good, especially since he is responding to Fox News' Bill O'Reilly and Bernie Goldberg.  The both get a quick lesson on how Irish and Jewish immigrants were decried in exactly the same terms now used for Latino immigrants.   But the highlight is about the 04:00 mark.

You don't need to worry so much.  What you are demonstrating is the health and vitality of America's greatest tradition--a fevered frightened ruling class lamenting the rise of a new ethnically and religiously diverse new class, one that will destroy all that is virtuous and good, and bring the American Experiment crashing to the ground.  Except you are fogetting one thing.  That is the American Experiment--an ethnic group arriving on America's shores to be reviled and hated, living in squalor (or, if they are lucky, Squalor Heights), working hard to give their children or grandchildren the opportunity to @#$%* on the next group landing on our shores.

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart	Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Best of Times
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

Niall Ferguson, history, and punditry

It looks as if Niall Ferguson has been caught being a bad boy, lying about his evidence, and for a Newsweek cover story no less!  I never paid much attention to him. It's one thing to have an ideological slant, we all do, but it's another to be a courtier.   Ferguson crossed that line long ago, becoming just another political pundit, but with history as his shtick. He's basically Victor Davis Hanson for the New Yorker set.

Eric Zeusse, an "investigative historian" (I wish I'd known about that job when I was making career choices), discusses the rarefied world of star pundits in relation to Fareed Zakaria.  We've known that some pundits have staffs working for them ever since the revelations about George Will and his "quote boys."  It is reasonable to have staff to do research, but the volume of material that star pundits produce suggests the staff duties often extend to ghost-writing.  Fareed Zakaria may not have actually been the one who plagiarized, although he will certainly never admit this.  

I would like to be charitable and assume that, like Fareed Zakaria, Ferguson probably got caught up in the punditry machine.  I imagine the pressure of producing reams of politically submissive opinion and analysis, often on areas outside one's expertise, on deadline will wear anyone down.   However, he is accused of lying about and manipulating the evidence.  This has no potential to be explained away by lack of research, carelessness, or sloppy note-taking under pressure.

If the allegations are justified (and they are about matters of fact), The Daily Beast and Newsweek should sack him...and invest in fact-checking departments. However, it is unrealistic to expect Harvard to do the same. It is possible Ferguson's alleged behaviour as a pundit does not extend to his scholarly work, although this work would have to now be treated with caution.  Whether Harvard wants faculty that have been rejected by The Daily Beast is up to them.

Some archaeology in the news

• A project in California to document the impact of sea-level rise on coastal archaeological sites--Rising Seas Threaten California’s Coastal Past. 
  “We are in the process of losing all of our maritime sites as a species. Every place that we’ve launched off to go explore the world through the ocean is now at risk.”

• An upcoming excavation of a 19th-century well at a Basque house in Boise, ID--Interesting finds highlight new Basque Block dig.
  Because everyone likes doll's heads with no eyes.

Neandertals, hide-scraping, and domestic goddesses

"Neanderthal man not only hunted, they did chores 

around the house as well, according to new research. 

  The Courier-Mail" (From the Herald Sun)

In 1995 Archaeology Magazine had a small article by Diane Gifford-Gonsalez called “The Drudge on the Hide” (Gifford-Gonsalez 1995:84). She talked about popular reconstructions of prehistoric life in representations like museum dioramas and illustrations, and pointed out the ubiquity of crouching women doing something boring, usually scraping hides. Hence “the Drudge on the Hide.” Men, on the other hand, are doing things like returning from the hunt with game slung over their shoulders, painting, or talking animatedly. And at least one child will be chasing, or being chased by, a dog.

For me it was a lesson in the obliviousness of privilege. I had never noticed that before—my eye just automatically wondered to the most prominent and animated parts of the reconstruction, and that usually wasn’t the women (unless, I’ll be honest, they were sexualized). This representation was so crude, so obvious, and everwhere--but I didn’t notice until someone pointed it out. Since Gifford-Gonsalez’ article, reconstructions seem to have improved. I have, for example, seen many more pictures of prehistoric women standing up and moving around. But the “Drudge on the Hide” seems to be firmly entrenched in popular consciousness.

I bring this up because of the coverage of an article that just came out in PLoSOne—”Neandertal Humeri May Reflect Adaptation to Scraping Tasks, but Not Spear Thrusting” (Shaw et al. 2012). To sum, Neandertals had much more developed right arms compared to their left. Modern humans have this assymetry as well, just not at the same scale. As far as handedness goes, Neandertals are like a population of tennis or cricket players (um, sort of). An influential explanation is that this assymmetry is due to Neandertal hunting techniques—close range hunting with thrusting spears. Shaw et al. make the argument that the overdeveloped musculature was actually produced by hide-scraping, rather than spear-thrusting, and they experimentally test this.

The article has been getting some well-deserved publicity. It is after all an interesting article with a significant finding, and a lot of interesting questions come out of it. Some of the coverage reflects this. It also appears to be a good article if you want masturbation jokes in your comments section. But a lot of the coverage is fascinated with the idea that Neandertal men were doing what is obviously “domestic” (i.e., women’s) work. There is nothing about gendered division of labour in the article, but that is the first place many reporters went. So we have headlines and articles replete with “domestic gods”, “domestic divas”, “domestic chores”, “new men” (“new Neandertals”) and even metrosexuality (?!). To be honest, I am really not sure the notion of “domestic” had that much meaning to Neandertals.

This is from Field and Stream (ok, no surprise there).

Now, as it turns out, scientists also believe Neanderthals were pretty good domestic divas, and they've got the huge right arms to prove it. 
So there you have it: Neanderthal men got so buff and manly not by running wild and free across the plains hunting with their Neanderthal buddies, but by staying home and helping out the wife with domestic duties. Some things never change. 

This is the headline from The Telegraph (no surprise there either).

Neanderthals' macho image may be wrong: Neanderthals have traditionally been seen as a race of macho hunters but in reality they spent much of their time carrying out domestic chores, a study has found.   

 From The Independent we have the following: 

Neanderthal man's 'life of domesticity 

Neanderthal man may have preferred domestic chores to a rugged hunter-gatherer lifestyle, researchers have said.

From (oh god) The Daily Mail (no surprise again, but you already knew that) we have the headline:

Neanderthal man 'was a domestic god': Powerful arms came from making clothes, not hunting mammoths

And from the U.K. Metro we get

Neanderthals weren't just hairy brutes - they were domestic gods at home: He has long been portrayed as a grunting, hairy brute who slaughtered mammoths with his bare hands. But the image of the Neanderthal took a battering yesterday when it was shown he was a multi-tasking domestic god.

And last, but certainly not least (mainly because of the illustration of the neandertal and vacuum cleaner...and the metro reference), from The Herald Sun in Melbourne we get:

Neanderthal man was a bit... metro 
AFTER a hard day’s woolly mammoth hunting, Neanderthal man could have been forgiven for putting his feet up by the fire in his cave. But not for long. For, contrary to his brutish image, it appears the hairy hunter was a bit of a whizz on the domestic front.

A Neanderthal new man, in fact. Scientists now believe the Neanderthals spent most of their time carrying out domestic chores. 

Thanks guys.  Good job all around.

I don't have a whole lot to add to this. Hide-scraping is a pretty obscure activity. Nobody scrapes hides today, not really. But somehow the mere mention of the words kicks off a remarkably repetitive set of associations. 
----------

Gifford-Gonsalez, Diane
1995  "The Drudge-on-the-Hide", Archaeology Magazine 48(2):84

Shaw, Colin N., Cory L. Hofmann, Michael D. Petraglia, Jay T. Stock, and Jinger S. Gottschall
2012  "Neandertal Humeri May Reflect Adaptation to Scraping Tasks, but Not Spear Thrusting." PLoS ONE 7(7). July 18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040349